SOMEONE IS WRECKING THIS BLOG. I LOOKED AT IT THIS MORNING AND FOUND WHAT I THOUGHT WERE COLOR CHANGES THAT HACKERS BROKE IN AND DID. SUBHEADINGS SHOULD BE LIGHT GRAY, NOT PURPLE, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE!!!!
BUT NOW, I'M FINDING NOT ONLY COLOR AND FONT CHANGES, BUT WORSE: THESE PERSONAL POSTS HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO READ LIKE AN EDITORIALLY FOOLISH PERSON IS DOING THE WRITING: ANYTHING TO RUIN THE SACRIFICIAL WORK THAT WENT INTO FAITHFUL BLOGS LIKE THIS.
HEAVEN HELP US.
I'm not a scientist, but how some people talk about pre-history makes my blood boil, so to speak.
If I don't know the great many technical facts that lifelong scientists have learned, I at least know, beyond any shadow of doubt, that the vision someone received in Genesis, is correct: telling us our human journey began with only one man and one woman. I also rest assured that the Bible is true in its vision of thousands upon thousands of years being as one "day" to our Heavenly maker. I trust, with my whole heart and understanding, that God, although His judgments can be grievous, is nearly infinitely patient with mankind, as is evident not only through all the Bible tells us, but also is evident through the millions of years He allowed for land to become fertile and for land to break apart into continents: continents that initially ensured we would be stranded from one another as groups of people, but that would allow mankind to gain in population and prosper more freely.
Still, the extreme simplicity of creation continues to elude some scientists, who talk as if the Neanderthals, for example, were not human. Some somewhat learned people still believe and talk the way many slave holders believed and spoke about African peoples, who they deemed subhuman.
I also wonder why any scientist or science writer still makes the extremely ill mistake of believing that, because all human beings apparently have an ancestral link to the Neanderthals, that must mean "humans" and "Neanderthals" mated at some point.
Heaven knows how wrong!
The Neanderthals were human beings, plain and simple. They were among our ancient cousins who apparently chose to go off on their own and live in isolation. And constant interbreeding among them was enough to cause bodily malformations.
That's so simple.
It's puzzling why any scientists continue to talk about human beings as if we evolved from different species — as opposed to the good sense we have that we evolved only ethnically (based on the closeness of the sun to the plots of earth where we lived, and also based on some of mankind's unspoken sins, including apparent Neanderthal practices with cannibalism — same as in ancient India and other parts of the world).
The fact is, we never have been different species. Not even other animals become whole new species through natural procreation. That is to say that if an animal is a natural-born bat, it remains a bat. And the 1,000 or so types of bats are not supposed to be called different species. Instead, we're supposed to say, and write, that there are about 1,000 subspecies of bats.
So simple!
But we don't say subspecies about ourselves, because it's obvious how wrong that would be.
Here are three outrageous articles to help you know more about what I mean:
https://guardianlv.com/2014/09/cave-art-reveals-the-neanderthal-more-intelligent-than-believed
https://sciencebulletin.org/inbreeding-and-population-demographic-shifts-could-have-led-to-neanderthal-extinction
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/africans-europeans-more-neanderthal-ancestry-160000127.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFNW9XOU25PLZSTLCNc-OB6HOMJpwZf8MYE7uFpqiVRtafvsgg-xeWo4zFjaXO8UcWjyJ41d1i8lwPSfNoE0GQOrgip6oXQj3Atwp48iPH9QOd2Z6JVUiTASZelJ9qJtmsmymcGiWnIy__avemWG5yGLji4n9VNC-yoFHVop2x_E
